Thursday, January 8, 2009

Another Bob Dutko hating moonbat attack:

Okay, here's another moonbat attack from the 4 harpies who run the hate site "10 Minutes With Bob Dutko" (Reprinted under the "Fair Use" act):

"Grady McMurtry: January 6, 2009"

I love it when "Doctor" Grady McMurtry is on the show. He seems to bring a fresh bag of crazy every time he is on. A few months back, Bob and Grady couldn't agree on which radiometric dating methods work and which don't. Then Grady went on to analogize gravity with evolution.

But on Tuesday, the good doctor threw out this whopper:

The last known dinosaur that can be documented living with people was in 1887. This was down in Bolivia, when a small armored dinosaur was killed.
Well, that's a new one for me! I scoured the Internets (OK, I just did some mild searching), but couldn't find anyone else making this claim. Perhaps Grady is confusing "small armored dinosaur" with an armadillo.

So, I hope Dutko and McMurtry fans will please point me towards this "documentation". I'm dying to see it.

P.S., I'm still waiting for the fossil evidence of the fire-breathing dragons....
Blogger Gordon said...

I wonder how many of McMurtry's fans realise that his father was a leading occultist?

January 7, 2009 9:19:00 AM EST

Blogger Lumberjack said...

Typical of McMurtry's dishonesty is a statement he made several years ago when discussing Louis Pasteur's experiment in which he allowed a piece of meat to rot in order to examine any possible emergence of new life. I state this from memory and may be off on some details.

I do, though, accurately recall McMurtry's chest-pounding summary of the experiment. "Pasteur proved it can't happen (life emernging from non-life)" No, Grady, he did not

Grady porports to be a creation "scientist" yet no "real" scientist would make such a blatently inaccurate, irresponsible statement.

Grady and Bob often take advantage of the fact that the general public is hopelessly uninfomred in matters of science. Only about 18% of the public can correctly describe a molecue and only 50% know the earth circles the sun annually.

Neither Bob or his audience would catch McMurtry's blunder, but an estute sceince editor would. That, I wish Bob understood, is why "real" scientists are quoted in the media and creation "scientists" are duly and properly ignored.
prove that at all. All he showed is that it did not happen in that instance -- and nothing more. Pasteur did not, and neither can anyone else, prove an unbounded negative. You can't prove there is no Santa Clause. That's logic 101. Got that Grady and Bob?

January 7, 2009 11:31:00 AM EST

Blogger realemon said...

I call him Dr. awkward pause. He is a Snarky ologist, who gives attitude to everyone who calls in, even the ones who are stupid enough to agree with him

January 7, 2009 3:55:00 PM EST

Blogger Jon said...

He says it was in Scientific American that this Bolivian dinosaur was documented in, if that helps.

January 7, 2009 5:21:00 PM EST

Blogger Kramer said...

I wonder if Mcmurtry knows he is not a scientist, and just hope's everyone will believe he is if he keeps refering to himself as such, or is he so delusional that he has actually come to believe himself a scientist.

January 7, 2009 6:32:00 PM EST

Blogger mystere's moonbat slayer club said...

You want some evidence for some fire breathing dragons Jeff? When your 3 boyfriends are about to fart, light a bonfire in front of them before they pass gas...You'll have some fire breathing dragons then!

As for the Big Bang Theory, when you fart with your boyfriends with the big bonfire going, there will be proof of the big bang: maybe all of Detroit will go up in flames!

January 8, 2009 10:37:00 AM EST

End of copied post.

Okay, maybe I'm being a bit rough on these guys this time? HAR HAR! NOT! After what they keep doing, they need to be shook up and awakened to truth and reality.


gsc062664 said...

This is a "christian" blog?? I don't think I can imagine Jesus attacking people, even people who disagree with you, in this manner.

mystere's moonbat slayer club said...


I have been anfairly attacked by the editors of 10 minutes with Bob Dutko, and they always delete every one of my comments. They have called me queer, and a bunch of other hateful bigoted names. I am merely giving them a taste of their own medicine. They continue to attack an innocent man Bob Dutko on their hate blogs...I know Bob through my work. He is not the man they portray in their hate blogs. I'm waiting for these cowards to respond back, and I want them to see themselves for what they really are: cowards! Normally, I'm more calm than what this blog shows.

mystere's moonbat slayer club said...


I punched the wrong button and deleted your comment, but I did not delete my email, so here is your reply to the comment:

izodman2000 has left a new comment on your post "Another Bob Dutko hating moonbat attack:":

I agree with gsc062664. I've looked over the history of your posts and I don't see a lot of Christ's love in your writings. I do sense a certain mean spiritedness and homophobia in your posts that betray a lack of compassion. Giving people a "taste of their own medicine" is not one of Jesus's teachings. I believe that love thy enemies and turn the other cheek are. Jesus was very clear in his teaching that we would be known by our fruits and, I say this with all sincerity in Christ, you may want rethink the kind of fruit you are producing on this blog.

mystere's moonbat slayer club said...

Okay Izodman, maybe I am a bit rough at this moment on some things. By the way, I don't have any sympathy for those who voted against Proposition 8, for it is written in Leviticus 18:22 "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." Homosexuality is wrong at all times, and marriage does not make it right. I will continually shake up those who try to advance things that are absolutely wrong, and it may appear mean spirited to some, but it can also be looked upon as tough love. Some have asked me to keep things private, which I will honor. As for my responses to the Bob Dutko haters, I have no intention on being nice to them after they have been viciously rotten for no reason whatsoever. Those 4 are nothing more than blog bullies who pick on innocent people for sport. I will stand up to these blog bullies, and be a reminder to them that they're being extremely painful reminder to them!

izodman2000 said...

You really need to reconsider your approach and motivations. You're not being a bit rough on them, you're responses come across as mean, hatefilled, spiteful rants. Homosexuality may be wrong in God's eyes, but so is demeaning those who you disagree with. If you truly want to have these bloggers see the error of their ways, I hardly think accusing them of being closet "homos" and filling your responses to their allegations with snide remarks instead of factual evidence to refute their claims is the way to go about it. I don't see how your blog is advancing the message of Christ in any way. When I read your entries I see the world, not Christ's love.