Gays poised to Nuke Voters' Will

It's judgement day for the fate of California's Proposition 8! Will the cry babies get their way, and nuke the voters' will? Or will the voters be heard, and send a message back to the Homosexual extremists? Will Perri Hilton start another temper tantrum over this? The show isn't over until the fat lezzy screams! And the butch is ready to pull the trigger!

Now in a gay marriage, who is the husband and who is the wife? OOOOOOOH! DOES IT SOUND MEAN & BIGOTED!!!!!???? Haaaah Haaaah! Here's what I think about gay marriages: Kaaaaah-haaaaaaack! Kaaaaah-haaaaaaack! Immorality has no place in this society!

California Supreme Court Upholds Gay Marriage Ban - The Political Jungle

From an E-maill on the Web

In Honor of the 44th President of the United States , Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has issued a new flavor, " Barocky Road ."

Barocky Road is a blend of half Vanilla, half Chocolate, and surrounded by Nuts and Flakes.

The Vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised and usually denied as an ingredient.

The Nuts and Flakes are all very bitter and hard to swallow. The Cost is over $100.00 per scoop.

When purchased, it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone, but then the Ice Cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you.

Thus you are left with an empty Wallet, no change, holding an empty cone, with no hope of getting any Ice Cream.

Now, aren't you feeling stimulated?

Obama Signs Pork Filled "Stimulus" Bill - The Political Jungle

Obama Signs Pork Filled "Stimulus" Bill - The
Political Jungle

Thank You Jenn Of The Jungle!

NOW:

WHERE'S THE BEEF?


By the way, Farmer John and Oscar Mayer will not touch this! And this is no Honeybaked Ham either!

Be sure to click the link to read Jenn Of The Jungle's post on this!

Digital Television Coupon Blunders - Send The Government A Big Message!

Now some of you who either read my blogs on a regular basis may be wondering why I'm saying things about the Digital Television conversion. With the coupon blunders the Democrats have committed, I think it's time we hold those representatives responsible for their stupidity! As you watch television across the United States, every station in every market has given the viewers a heads up on the changes coming on February 17th 2009. The stations have taken every measure to switch over from analog to digital, and we have absolutely no excuse to not be prepared for the changes. While the government has told us to be ready on February 17th by either having a converter box, cable or satellite services, or a compatible new television, they're now saying that they may delay the transition due to their own blunders! While the dumbocrats are divided on delaying the transition to June 2009, they're telling the stations to keep the power on the analog transmitters due to their blunders. My question is this: why should every station consume hundreds of thousands of kilowatts extra every day from February 17th onwards to June 2009 just for Nancy and Harry's big blunders? I say send a message to Nancy and Harry by pulling the plug on the analog transmitters on February 17th permanently even if they extend the deadline to June 2009! Let the FCC deal with some angry folks who call in to whine about not having a signal! In fact, feel free to print this blog up, and send a copy to your local television stations to send the message to those clowns who goofed off in the House and Senate. Stations should not have to use more electricity due to the stupidity of the government's blunders. In fact, tell your local stations to pull the plug on the analog transmitters anyways, even if the government extends the deadline to June 2009! And by the way, this was one of the pork barrel earmarks on the stimulus bill that Republicans refused to approve. Democrats, WHAT WAS THAT ABOUT? And by the way, since you Democrats scream and whine about "global warming", why are some of you voting to extend the deadline, and trying to force the stations to use more electricity to power those analog transmitters?

Innauguration 2009 Protest

OH MY! THE DAY HAS FINALLY ARRIVED! WE'LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS OVER THE NEXT 4 YEARS. TIME TO SAY OUR PRAYERS FOR OBAMA, IF WE HAVEN'T YET STARTED PRAYING FOR GOD'S GUIDANCE.

Another Bob Dutko hating moonbat attack:

Okay, here's another moonbat attack from the 4 harpies who run the hate site "10 Minutes With Bob Dutko" (Reprinted under the "Fair Use" act):

"Grady McMurtry: January 6, 2009"

Collapse comments

I love it when "Doctor" Grady McMurtry is on the show. He seems to bring a fresh bag of crazy every time he is on. A few months back, Bob and Grady couldn't agree on which radiometric dating methods work and which don't. Then Grady went on to analogize gravity with evolution.

But on Tuesday, the good doctor threw out this whopper:

The last known dinosaur that can be documented living with people was in 1887. This was down in Bolivia, when a small armored dinosaur was killed.
Well, that's a new one for me! I scoured the Internets (OK, I just did some mild searching), but couldn't find anyone else making this claim. Perhaps Grady is confusing "small armored dinosaur" with an armadillo.

So, I hope Dutko and McMurtry fans will please point me towards this "documentation". I'm dying to see it.

P.S., I'm still waiting for the fossil evidence of the fire-breathing dragons....

Gordon said...

I wonder how many of McMurtry's fans realise that his father was a leading occultist?

January 7, 2009 9:19:00 AM EST

Lumberjack said...

Typical of McMurtry's dishonesty is a statement he made several years ago when discussing Louis Pasteur's experiment in which he allowed a piece of meat to rot in order to examine any possible emergence of new life. I state this from memory and may be off on some details.

I do, though, accurately recall McMurtry's chest-pounding summary of the experiment. "Pasteur proved it can't happen (life emernging from non-life)" No, Grady, he did not

Grady porports to be a creation "scientist" yet no "real" scientist would make such a blatently inaccurate, irresponsible statement.

Grady and Bob often take advantage of the fact that the general public is hopelessly uninfomred in matters of science. Only about 18% of the public can correctly describe a molecue and only 50% know the earth circles the sun annually.

Neither Bob or his audience would catch McMurtry's blunder, but an estute sceince editor would. That, I wish Bob understood, is why "real" scientists are quoted in the media and creation "scientists" are duly and properly ignored. prove that at all. All he showed is that it did not happen in that instance -- and nothing more. Pasteur did not, and neither can anyone else, prove an unbounded negative. You can't prove there is no Santa Clause. That's logic 101. Got that Grady and Bob?

January 7, 2009 11:31:00 AM EST

realemon said...

I call him Dr. awkward pause. He is a Snarky ologist, who gives attitude to everyone who calls in, even the ones who are stupid enough to agree with him

January 7, 2009 3:55:00 PM EST

Jon said...

He says it was in Scientific American that this Bolivian dinosaur was documented in, if that helps.

January 7, 2009 5:21:00 PM EST

Kramer said...

I wonder if Mcmurtry knows he is not a scientist, and just hope's everyone will believe he is if he keeps refering to himself as such, or is he so delusional that he has actually come to believe himself a scientist.

January 7, 2009 6:32:00 PM EST

mystere's moonbat slayer club said...

You want some evidence for some fire breathing dragons Jeff? When your 3 boyfriends are about to fart, light a bonfire in front of them before they pass gas...You'll have some fire breathing dragons then!

As for the Big Bang Theory, when you fart with your boyfriends with the big bonfire going, there will be proof of the big bang: maybe all of Detroit will go up in flames!

January 8, 2009 10:37:00 AM EST

End of copied post.

Okay, maybe I'm being a bit rough on these guys this time? HAR HAR! NOT! After what they keep doing, they need to be shook up and awakened to truth and reality.

Area 51 Moonbat confirms Roland Burris to Senate Seat.

Funny how bad publicity changes the mind of the senator from "Area 51" and gets him to welcome the Vich's choice of replacement for Junior Senator Barack Obama. With the huge flack Moonbat Harry Reid got for his hemming and hawing, he finally approved Roland Burris for the vacated seat of President - elect Barack Obama. The comparison to Lester Maddox and George Wallace got through to this Kook! Call this moment for what it is: When Harry Met Silly! Now what's going to happen to the Democratic Party? Are they still falling into the hall of shame? By the way, Burris is a good man! He is honest, and has gotten praise from both the moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans.

Jerry Brown's an unfaithful closet queen idiot!

From National Review Online:


December 23, 2008 4:00 AM

Gross Dereliction of Duty
By the Editors

As attorney general of California, Jerry Brown has a duty to defend the state and its laws in court. That duty requires him to offer the best grounds in defense of any law that may reasonably be defended. In a brief he filed last Friday in the case challenging Proposition 8 — the ballot measure that amended California’s constitution to ban same-sex marriage — Brown grossly violated that duty. On Election Day, California voters approved Proposition 8. Opponents of Proposition 8 then rushed to court to invalidate it on the novel theory that it was a “revision” to, rather than an “amendment” of, the state constitution, and that this “revision” could not be accomplished through the ballot-initiative process.

The brief that Brown filed for the state last Friday properly rejects the claim that Proposition 8 amounts to a revision rather than an amendment. But instead of presenting the best grounds in defense of the legality of Proposition 8, Brown’s brief offers the crackpot theory — beyond anything the opponents of Proposition 8 have argued, and beyond the scope of the briefing that the supreme court invited — that the constitutional amendment achieved by Proposition 8 is itself unconstitutional.

Here is how Brown summarizes his argument in his press release: “The amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification.” Brown invents this argument out of whole cloth: Further, how is it that a “right” to same-sex marriage that the state supreme court invented just months ago, and that even Brown’s brief concedes was not something “the Framers [of the state constitution] contemplated,” should suddenly be deemed a “fundamental” constitutional right?

Brown’s answer is judicial activism on stilts: Any right that the state supreme court has found to be protected as (in Brown’s phrase) “part of fundamental human liberty” under the state constitution is ipso facto a “fundamental” right. And, further, the fact that the court found such a right means there is no “compelling justification” for its abrogation. In Brown’s theory, there is no popular check on the judicial-activist invention of rights.

This is not the first time Brown has indulged his policy preference for same-sex marriage. In the marriage case that led to the supreme court’s creation of a right to same-sex marriage, Brown expressly repudiated the procreation-based argument for traditional marriage that had prevailed in some liberal courts. And he changed the ballot title for Proposition 8 from “Limit on Marriage. Constitutional Amendment” to “Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry Initiative. Constitutional Amendment” — a move seemingly intended to cost the initiative votes.

Brown’s brief is both a violation of his duty and professional malpractice. It’s good to see that some liberal law professors in California have already criticized Brown: One says that Brown’s argument “turns constitutional law on its head,” and another calls his position “extraordinary.” But Brown’s betrayal of the public trust deserves broader condemnation from political and legal leaders in California, including governor Arnold Schwarzenegger,
irrespective of their own positions on marriage.

Now why didn't Jerry marry Linda Ronstadt back in the 70s, when most red blooded men would have done about anything to get a date with her? Perhaps Jerry's a closet queen? You think? Jerry deserves the next award I'm just about to hand out to him: