Have you laughed at a liberal today? POOR LIBERALS! They're crying over the big loss, as Lauren Boebert won the seat again.
A Democrat running for Congress in California worked to bring an educational program sponsored by the Chinese Communist Party into his community's K-12 classrooms.
As a member of the Hacienda La Puente school board in 2010, Democrat Jay Chen spearheaded an effort to bring the Confucius Classroom program to his district. The program is funded and run by China's Ministry of Education, an arm of the Chinese Communist Party that provides American K-12 schools with teachers and curriculum materials to teach their students Chinese language and culture. It's also linked to the CCP's Confucius Institute program, which provides similar resources to colleges and universities across the United States. The State Department in 2020 labeled that program a Chinese propaganda entity aimed at "advancing Beijing's global propaganda and malign influence campaign," and CCP officials have acknowledged that Confucius Institutes are "an important part of China's overseas propaganda set-up."
Roughly a decade after voting to bring a Confucius Classroom to Southern California, Chen is running to unseat freshman congresswoman Michelle Steel (R., Calif.). But the Democrat isn't distancing himself from his school board tenure—in fact, he's fundraising off of it. In a recent campaign email, Chen accused Steel of engaging in "anti-Asian racism" and contributing to the "rise in violent, anti-Asian hate crimes" after Steel highlighted Chen's support for "CCP-sponsored schools." Chen also dismissed criticism of Confucius Classrooms, which he described merely as a "Chinese language and culture program" that is not tied to the CCP.
Steel spokesman Lance Trover brushed off Chen's anti-Asian racism charge as "ridiculous," noting that Steel is one of the first Korean-American women to serve in Congress.
"There is broad bipartisan agreement that Confucius Institutes are an indoctrination effort funded by the Chinese Communist Party," Trover said. "Rather than condemn these indoctrination efforts, Jay Chen decided to double down on his support and call congresswoman Steel anti-Asian. This all raises serious questions about his ties to China, as well as his judgment for a ridiculous attack on one of the first Korean-American women elected to Congress. He owes voters an explanation."
Chen, who did not return a request for comment, was not entirely successful in his bid to launch a Confucius Classroom in his district. Following pushback from local parents, the district rejected the CCP's funding and teachers but accepted program textbooks from China, the Los Angeles Daily News reported in 2011. Chen defended that decision at the time, saying he didn't "see anything sinister about using books from China" given that "practically everything we use is made in China."
This is not Chen's first congressional run. In 2012, the Democrat unsuccessfully challenged then-Republican incumbent Ed Royce, losing by roughly 40,000 votes. Steel, meanwhile, was one of four California Republicans to flip blue seats to red in 2020, marking the most successful year for the Golden State Republican Party in recent memory. Steel defeated former Democratic congressman Harley Rouda by 2 points, even as President Joe Biden narrowly carried the district.
Chen, who now serves as president of the Mt. San Antonio College board of trustees, will have to navigate Biden's declining popularity in California if he is to successfully unseat Steel. According to a Berkeley IGS poll, just 47 percent of California voters approve of Biden's job performance, down from 62 percent in April of last year. Biden won the state by nearly 30 points in 2020.
Are you going to back a Communist Chinaman or vote for a naturalized patriot in the 45th Congressional District in California?
 Katie Porter | |
|---|---|
| Billions in Liberal Spending |  |
| Higher Taxes on the Middle Class | |
| Nearly Doubling the Size of the IRS Link to: The Truth About Katie Porter https://cluelesskatieporter.com/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=Hurt&utm_content=text&gclid=CjwKCAjwh4ObBhAzEiwAHzZYU0t8i57PQLVOij2s-GLygelYg-aDdVNRJgXbvybi-kdn5qd6VsXKJRoC6KYQAvD_BwE | |
Stacey Abrams has sparked outrage after she claimed that fetal heartbeats are a ‘manufactured sound’ which allow men to ‘take control of a woman’s’ body.
The Democrats' gubernatorial nominee for Georgia previously opposed abortion rights, but after admitting she was ‘wrong’, made a U-turn to become a pro-choice advocate.
During an event in Atlanta, she claimed that there is ‘no such thing’ as fetal heartbeat at six weeks of gestation – taking aim at the controversial ‘Heartbeat Law’.
Under the current legislation, abortion is banned after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which often cannot be heard until a woman is at least seven weeks pregnant.
US Senator Lindsey Adams slammed her comments, saying she is trying to ‘change science’ by ‘denying that the baby has a heartbeat’.
Abrams appeared to be talking about the technical definition of the heartbeat, which is electrical activity caught on a vaginal ultrasound and then used to mimic a heartbeat.
It can only be detected through invasive transvaginal scan before six weeks, and a fetus’ heart is often not fully developed until the 10th week of pregnancy.
It is at that point of a pregnancy that an abdominal ultrasound can be used pick up the sound of a fetus's heartbeat can be picked up.
Addressing the audience at the event she said: 'There is no such thing as a heartbeat at six weeks. It is a manufactured sound designed to convince people that men have the right to take control of a woman's body.'
DailyMail.com columnist Meghan McCain also hit out at Abrams, saying: ‘Hearing my babies heartbeats at 6 weeks is hands down one of the most exciting, liberating and most beautiful moments of my entire life.
‘Hands down. Stacey Abrams is a very sick person to say this and somehow accuse doctors of faking fetal heartbeats. Full stop.’
Senator Adams added: ‘Stacey Abrams perfectly encapsulates the belief and direction of the Democratic Party when it comes to the unborn -- deny science and support abortion on demand up until the moment of birth.
Stacey Abrams says fetal heartbeats are a 'manufactured sound' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11239717/Stacey-Abrams-stuns-panel-says-fetal-heartbeats-manufactured-sound.html?ito=native_share_article-topDaily Mail
Assface Dervish Sanders threw a hissyfit at his hate site recently. Someone at Google allegedly tossed out one of his hate posts. He blames Mystere for it, but has 0 proof.
July 28, 2022 at 8:57 AM
I noticed this morning that this post was missing. I looked at my blogger dashboard and saw the following notice...
"This post was unpublished because it violates Blogger Community Guidelines. To republish, please update the content to adhere to guidelines".
What Blogger guideline did/does this post violate? I don't know. I can guess, but Blogger did not specifically say what community guideline they believe this post violates (or violated). I made some minor changes (removing something I thought might be causing the problem) then copied and pasted the content into a new blog post.
I didn't lose any comments because there weren't any. Was my post flagged by a bot? Or did someone report this post? I'm not sure. Unless Mystere wants to take credit (he might want to gloat).
As for what changes I made, I'm not going to say. Lest it inform someone as to what worked in getting my post flagged. And therefore they will know what to do in the future to get more posts (or possibly even this blog) removed.
The original post is still showing under my dashboard as reverted to draft. If I click "edit", I see a button on the top right that says "request review". I am not going to click it. Why? Because my preference is to not unnecessarily invite scrutiny. I don't think I did anything wrong, but who knows what might happen if I ask for a "review". I didn't lose the post or any comments (as there were none that I ever saw) so I'm fine just republishing. So long as this republished post is also not reverted to draft because it "violates community guidelines".
That a-hole Mystere thinks I "attacked" his Wordpress blogs. All I did was report him because he was faking comments from me on one of his blogs. And the faked comments linked to my Gravatar account. Making me think he somehow hacked it. I'm not sure.
No one here wants to take credit for that, Assface Dervish. But a webcam caught a photo of you the moment you got that notice.
I do know I did not like it that comments on his blog that DEFINITELY appeared to have been made by me (with MY account) were not. So I reported it. Automatic (WordPress) decided Mystere violated their TOS and removed a number of his blogs, which made Mystere very angry. According to him, someone hacked him, then used his hacked account to hack my account. Sounds like BS to me.
Mystere: Tennessee libturd... Dervish Sanders... attacked my WordPress blogs, and got my blogs deleted when one of his allies attacked my sites, harvested data when Google and Yahoo got hacked and compromised, and hacked into his accounts using my Automatic account to hack his account (10/29/2021 at 12:26 AM).
Posts
All Comments
.jpg)
Posts
All Comments
.jpg)
.jpg)
